|

|
Settlement
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
EASTERN DIVISION
| In Re:
SEARS RETIREE GROUP LIFE |
) |
Civil Action |
| INSURANCE
LITIGATION THIS DOCUMENT |
) |
No. 97 C 7453 |
| RELATES TO: ALL
ACTIONS |
) |
Judge James B.
Moran |
NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT
This is a Notice about the Sears Retiree Group Life
Insurance lawsuit.
According to Sears' records, you are a Class Member who may be entitled
to share in the benefits of the proposed Settlement described in this
Notice. Please read this Notice carefully as it affects your rights.
|
READ THIS FIRST:
1. This Notice describes the terms of a proposed final Settlement
of all lawsuits that challenged Sears’ 1997 decision to cut back the
amount of your retiree life insurance. You can only receive certain
benefits under the Settlement if you sign and return the blue Claim
Form enclosed with this Notice by January 17, 2002. See
instructions, page 6.
2. You have several rights in connection with the proposed
Settlement:
a. You have the right to attend a court hearing on March 5,
2002 on the fairness of this Settlement. You are not required to
attend.
b. You have the right to make a written objection or comment
concerning the Settlement. Objections and comments must be mailed
by December 10, 2001.
c. You may opt out of the Settlement by requesting exclusion
from the Class. Requests for Exclusion must be mailed by December
10, 2001.
d. If you do not request exclusion, you may enter an appearance
through counsel. If you do not employ your own attorney, Class
Counsel will represent your interests.
3. If you have questions, you may call 1-800-347-0716.
PLEASE
DO NOT CALL THE COURT OR COURT PERSONNEL ABOUT THIS SETTLEMENT.
|
THE HISTORY OF THIS SUIT
In September 1997, Sears announced that retiree life insurance
would be cut back at the rate of 10% per year on each retiree’s life
insurance amount in excess of $5,000. At the end of ten years, each
retiree would have a $5,000 retiree life insurance policy,
regardless of original amount. The only way to avoid these cuts was
to buy replacement insurance, at the retiree’s expense.
Shortly after the announcement, a number of suits were filed
against Sears by retirees who believed they had been promised “free”
or “paid up” life insurance for the rest of their lives. All
lawsuits were eventually consolidated in the United States District
Court in Chicago, Illinois, and were assigned to Judge James B.
Moran. In essence, the complaints alleged that Sears had violated a
federal law known as ERISA, the Employee Retirement Income Security
Act of 1974. The plaintiffs claimed Sears' benefit cutback breached
its contract with retirees under the terms of the group life
insurance plan. Retirees also claimed that by misrepresenting the
life insurance as "free" and "paid up" on retirement, Sears had
breached its fiduciary duty to them.
Sears, at all times, has denied that it violated any legal
obligation to its retirees, and contended that it had a legal right
at all times to modify or terminate the retiree insurance program.
The Court certified a class of Sears’ retirees on the breach of
contract claims, but ruled on two occasions that each retiree would
have to individually prove his or her breach of fiduciary duty
claim. The Court subsequently granted Sears' motion for summary
judgment on the breach of contract claims certified for class
treatment, holding that Sears did not breach the terms of the plan.
The parties began negotiations in March, 2001, at a time when
they were preparing to try the breach of fiduciary duty claims of a
group of twelve named plaintiffs. On June 1, 2001, Sears moved for
summary judgment on the breach of fiduciary duty claims of each of
the named plaintiffs in this first group. On June 5, 2001, after
extensive mediation, the parties reached agreement to settle the
case. On October 10, 2001, the Court directed the parties to provide
each class member with a copy of this Notice and a blue Claim Form.
This Notice is not an expression of opinion by the Court on the
merits of the remaining claims and defenses in the case, nor is it
an expression of opinion about the merits of this proposed
Settlement. Rather, this Notice is sent as required by the Federal
Rules of Civil Procedure for the purpose of informing you of your
rights with regard to the proposed Settlement.
SUMMARY OF SETTLEMENT TERMS
- Whether or not you file a Claim Form, the Settlement Agreement
provides that Sears cannot further accelerate the life insurance
reduction schedule that began in 1998 and it cannot reduce the
final insurance amount to less than $5,000.
- A blue Claim Form is enclosed. Its terms are self-explanatory.
Though it need not be notarized, it is to be signed under penalty
of perjury. Under the Settlement Agreement, Claim Forms must be
received at the address on the Claim Form no later than January
17, 2002. Timely submitted Claim Forms shall be considered
approved unless Sears challenges a claim based upon substantial
evidence of fraud, in which case the validity of the claim will be
resolved by a mediator. Additional Claim Forms may be requested by
telephoning the toll-free number shown on page 1 of this Notice,
and may be downloaded from the website maintained by NARSE (the
National Association of Retired Sears Employees).
- Class members who timely mail Claim Forms that are approved
are guaranteed at least one less annual reduction
than the scheduled ten reductions. Their final insurance amount
will therefore be at least $5,000 plus the amount of
one year’s reduction. The “skipped” reduction will be the
reduction previously scheduled for the year 2003.
EXAMPLE
If you started with $15,000 of retiree life insurance, your
insurance amount has decreased $1,000 per year since January 1,
1998. Under this Settlement, if you timely file an approved Claim
Form, the previously scheduled reduction for year 2003 will be
skipped, and the final amount of insurance in year 2007 and
thereafter will be $6,000 instead of $5,000. The table below shows
how this works:
Table 1
Example -- Effect of Settlement on A Retiree With
$15,000 Policy
Before 1998 Who Files An Approved Claims Form
|
Year |
Old
Reduction Schedule |
New Reduction Schedule
Under Proposed Settlement |
Insurance Before
Reduction Began |
$15,000
|
$15,000 |
|
1998 |
14,000 |
14,000 |
|
1999 |
13,000 |
13,000 |
|
2000 |
12,000 |
12,000 |
|
2001 |
11,000 |
11,000 |
|
2002 |
10,000 |
10,000 |
|
2003 |
9,000 |
9,000 |
|
2004 |
8,000 |
8,000 |
|
2005 |
7,000 |
7,000 |
|
2006 |
6,000 |
6,000 |
|
2007
(Final) |
5,000 |
5,000 |
| |
Total of 10
reductions;
final insurance amount
$5,000 |
Total of 9 reductions;
final insurance amount $6,000 |
-
Those Class Members who timely file
approved Claim Forms (“Approved Claimants”) may be entitled to have
Sears forego more than the guaranteed one year reduction in 2003
depending on the number of Class Members who file claims. Exact
quantification is not possible until all the Claim Forms are
received; further details are discussed in paragraph 5 of this
Summary.
- Under the Settlement Agreement, only a one-year
freeze in the life insurance reductions is guaranteed for Approved
Claimants. However, depending on the number of Class Members who file
claims, Approved Claimants may be entitled to have Sears freeze more
than the guaranteed one year reduction in 2003. That depends on certain
actuarial calculations, as described below.
 | The parties will first determine the “Participation
Rate” by taking the total number of Approved Claimants and dividing it
by the total number of living Class Members as of the date this Notice
was sent.
|
 | The parties then will calculate the “net present
value” (an actuarial term defined in the Settlement Agreement) of the
cost to Sears of freezing the scheduled reduction for the year 2003 for
all Approved Claimants (“the 2003 Freeze Cost”). The parties estimate
that if 100% of Class Members were to file claims, the 2003 Freeze Cost
would be roughly $34.2 million.
|
 | The 2003 Freeze Cost for a particular Participation
Rate cannot be predicted in advance, because it depends on the size of
the policies of the Approved Claimants. For example, if the
Participation Rate is 35%, the 2003 Freeze Cost will be bigger if the
Approved Claimants are the 35% with the largest insurance benefits,
rather than the 35% with the smallest insurance benefits.
|
 | After determining the Participation Rate and
calculating Sears’ 2003 Freeze Cost, the parties compare the 2003 Freeze
Cost to the “Guaranteed Minimum Amount” for the corresponding
Participation Rate in the following table: |
Table 2
|
Participation Rate |
Guaranteed Minimum Amount |
|
50% or Higher |
$28 Million |
|
49% |
$27.7 Million |
|
48% |
$27.4 Million |
|
47% |
$27.1 Million |
|
46% |
$26.8 Million |
|
45% |
$326.5 Million |
|
44% |
$26.2 Million |
|
43% |
$25.9 Million |
|
42% |
$25.6 Million |
|
41% |
$25.3 Million |
|
40% |
$25 Million |
|
39% |
$24.7 Million |
|
38% |
$24.4 Million |
|
37% |
$24.1 Million |
|
36% |
$23.8 Million |
|
35% |
$23.5 Million |
|
34% |
$23.2 Million |
|
33% |
$22.9 Million |
|
32% |
$22.6 Million |
|
31% |
$22.3 Million |
|
30 % or less |
$22 Million |
 | If Sears’ 2003 Freeze Cost is the same as or larger
than the Guaranteed Minimum Amount for the corresponding Participation
Rate in Table 2, then Sears will freeze the life insurance reduction for
Approved Claimants only in the year 2003. However, if the 2003 Freeze
Cost is smaller than the Guaranteed Minimum Amount for the corresponding
Participation Rate, then Sears will freeze the life insurance reduction
for Approved Claimants in the year 2003 and, in addition, will freeze
additional life insurance reductions for the Approved Claimants (on a
pro rata basis) in 2004 and possibly later years, until the net present
value of the total cost to Sears is equal to the Guaranteed Minimum
Amount for the corresponding Participation Rate.
|
 | A concrete example will help to illustrate this
abstract explanation. Assume that the Participation Rate is 35% (that
is, the number of Approved Claimants is equal to 35% of the number of
living Class Members as of the date this notice was sent). That means
the Guaranteed Minimum Amount, the right-hand column in Table 2 above,
is $23.5 million. If Sears’ 2003 Freeze Cost is $23.5 million or larger,
then Sears will freeze the life insurance reduction for Approved
Claimants only in the year 2003. However, if Sears’ 2003 Freeze Cost For
Approved Claimants is smaller than $23.5 million, then Sears will freeze
the life insurance reduction for Approved Claimants in the year 2003
and, in addition, will freeze additional reductions for the Approved
Claimants (on a pro rata basis) in 2004 and possibly later years, until
the net present value of the total cost to Sears is equal to $23.5
million.
|
 | The same conditions apply for each line of Table 2.
If Sears’ 2003 Freeze Cost for a particular Participation Rate in the
left-hand column is smaller than the corresponding Guaranteed Minimum
Amount in the right-hand column, there will be additional benefit for
the Approved Claimants.
|
 | As Table 2 shows, if the Participation Rate is 30% or
less, the Guaranteed Minimum Amount is $22 million. Thus, even if only a
small percentage of the Class files approved claims, Sears will freeze
life insurance reductions for Approved Claimants (and possibly reinstate
prior years’ reductions for Approved Claimants) until the total cost to
Sears is $22 million.
|
 | If money is left over after foregoing all remaining
scheduled reductions and reinstating all prior reductions for Approved
Claimants, the remaining amount will be distributed Pro rata to the
Approved Claimants, unless the remaining amount is less than $1.5
million, in which case it will be donated to charity.
|
- The benefits under this proposed Settlement apply to
all Class Members, whether or not they paid “replacement premiums” to
avoid Sears’ cutbacks. However, Class Members must file a Claim Form to
obtain the benefits in paragraphs 3-5.
- This settlement applies to some persons on “premium
waiver” due to disability at the time Sears implemented retiree life
insurance cut backs. Persons whose disability coverage and “premium
waiver” ended and who were not previously provided an opportunity to
purchase replacement insurance will be permitted to purchase replacement
insurance and will be eligible to receive the other benefits of the
Settlement. The beneficiaries of such persons who died without being
allowed to purchase replacement coverage will be entitled to receive the
full unreduced amount of retiree life insurance less the cost of the
replacement insurance, less any benefits already paid. There will be a
separate mailing to these persons.
- The estates of retirees who die (or have died)
between January 1, 1998 and December 31, 2002 will receive a $100
unrestricted Sears gift card. (The gift card will be sent, for
distribution and use in accordance with the direction of the
administrator or executor of the estate, to the beneficiary receiving
the highest percentage of the life insurance payment for that retiree,
or, if all beneficiaries for that retiree receive an equal percentage,
the beneficiary whose first name comes first alphabetically.)
- Sears will pay each of the 71 named plaintiffs who
brought the lawsuit a $5,000 special payment for the risk, time and
efforts they expended in bringing the case. The activities the named
Plaintiffs participated in included obtaining counsel, working with
counsel, filing suits, producing documents, answering written questions
from Sears’ lawyers and traveling to depositions, where they answered
oral questions under oath asked by the lawyers for Sears.
- Attorneys fees and costs of the litigation will be
paid by Sears, not the class. The Court will decide the amount of fees and
costs Sears must pay, which cannot exceed $5.43 million.
- If the Settlement is approved, it will be binding on
all Class Members who do not request exclusion. If more than 1,000
retirees request exclusion, Sears has the right to terminate the
proposed Settlement.
|
INSTRUCTIONS FOR FILING CLAIMS
TO BE ELIGIBLE TO BENEFIT FROM A ONE YEAR (AND
POSSIBLY MORE THAN ONE YEAR) FREEZE IN SEARS LIFE INSURANCE
REDUCTIONS, YOU MUST COMPLETE AND SIGN THE CLAIM FORM AND RETURN IT
BY THE JANUARY 17, 2002 DEADLINE. FOLLOW THE MAILING INSTRUCTIONS ON
THE CLAIM FORM.
If you do not timely submit a Claim Form, you will
not be eligible to (and will not) receive a freeze in scheduled
reductions in 2003 or other years, but Sears will not reduce your
life insurance benefit below $5,000, and will not accelerate the
reduction schedule.
WHETHER YOU FILE A CLAIM FORM OR NOT, YOU ARE
BOUND BY THE TERMS OF THIS SETTLEMENT, INCLUDING THE RELEASE OF LIFE
INSURANCE CLAIMS AGAINST SEARS, UNLESS YOU REQUEST EXCLUSION. IF YOU
REQUEST EXCLUSION, YOU DO NOT RELEASE YOUR CLAIMS AGAINST SEARS AND
YOU ARE NOT ELIGIBLE TO RECEIVE BENEFITS FROM THE SETTLEMENT.
|
THE FAIRNESS HEARING
You are notified that a final hearing on a motion by both parties to
approve the proposed Settlement (the “Fairness Hearing”) will be held at
the United States Courthouse, 219 South Dearborn Street, Courtroom 1843 on
March 5, 2002, at 10:00am for the purpose of determining whether the
proposed Settlement is fair, adequate and proper, and whether the Court
should enter judgment approving the Settlement, approving payments of
class representative awards, attorneys’ fees, costs, and other relief
requested.
You have the right to attend the hearing, but you are not required to
do so. If you do plan to attend, you should telephone the toll free number
shown on the first and last pages of this Notice several days in advance
to be sure the hearing has not been rescheduled.
If the proposed Settlement is approved by the Court following the
Fairness Hearing, the parties will jointly request the Court to enter
final judgment that (a) approves the Settlement Agreement; (b) dismisses
the class action with prejudice as to Sears as against all plaintiffs and
all class members except those that have requested exclusion; (c) releases
and discharges Sears from any and all liability with respect to the
Settled Claims; (d) releases and discharges the Released Plaintiffs from
any and all liability with respect to the Settled Claims; (e) awards class
representative awards subject to the terms of the Stipulation of Final
Settlement; and (f) reserves continuing and exclusive jurisdiction over
enforcement of the Settlement. In addition, the Plaintiffs will request
that the Court order Sears to pay Plaintiffs’ attorneys their fees, costs
and expenses in an amount between $1.00 and $5,430,000.
YOUR RIGHT TO OBJECT TO
THE PROPOSED SETTLEMENT
You have a right to object or comment on the Settlement. You may, but
are not required to, attend the Fairness Hearing either in person or by
your attorney. Any Class Member who desires to object or comment on the
Settlement must comply with the following rules:
- All objections and comments must be received no later than December
10, 2001. Objections should be sent by first class mail to the Clerk of
the United States District Court, P.O. Box 803938, Chicago, IL.,
60680-3938, with copies to (a) Michael M. Mulder, Esq., Meites, Mulder,
Burger & Mollica, 208 South LaSalle Street, Suite 1410, Chicago,
Illinois 60604; (b) Wood R. Foster, Jr., Esq., Siegel, Brill, Greupner,
Duffy & Foster, P.A., 1300 Washington Square, 100 Washington Avenue
South, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402; (c) Charles R. Watkins, Esq, Susman
& Watkins, Two First National Plaza, Suite 600, Chicago, Illinois 60603;
and (d) Charles F. Regan, Jr., Esq., Mayer, Brown & Platt, 190 South
LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60603.
- Note if you file an objection you may also file a Claim Form. If
you do not file a Claim Form and your objection is overruled you will be
bound by the Settlement, unable to obtain relief from at least the one
year freeze in reductions, while completely releasing your claims.
- If you desire to be represented at the Fairness Hearing by counsel
of your own choosing, your attorney must file an appearance on or before
December 10, 2001.
- Objections will be considered by the Court at the Fairness Hearing.
Objectors and/or their representatives will have a chance to speak on
the objection if desired.
YOUR RIGHT TO REQUEST EXCLUSION
FROM THIS PROPOSED SETTLEMENT
The Court will exclude any member of the Class who desires not to be
bound by the Settlement, but all Requests for Exclusion must be in writing
and must be received by the Clerk of the United States District Court, P.
O. Box 803938, Chicago, IL., 60680-3938, no later than December 10, 2001.
The Request for Exclusion must include the name, address, and social
security number of the retiree. If you request exclusion you will not
participate in or benefit from the Settlement if it is approved. Note you
can not both request exclusion and file a Claim Form.
AVAILABILITY OF DOCUMENTS
FOR YOU TO REVIEW
The Stipulation of Final Settlement in this case, together with
exhibits and all other papers are available for your inspection, should
you choose to do so, in the office of the Clerk of United States District
Court, United States Courthouse, 219 South Dearborn Street, 20th Floor,
Chicago, Illinois, 60604.
|
DO NOT CALL OR WRITE COURT PERSONNEL
FOR INFORMATION. |
If you have questions concerning this Notice, please call the
Settlement Administrator at 1-800-347-0716 or by writing one of the Class
Counsel: Michael M. Mulder, Meites, Mulder, Burger & Mollica, 208 South
LaSalle Street, Suite 1410, Chicago, Illinois, 60604.
Clerk of United States District Court
Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division
Chicago, Illinois
|
KEEP THIS NOTICE FOR FUTURE REFERENCE IN
THIS MATTER.
|
|
|